国产三级大片在线观看-国产三级电影-国产三级电影经典在线看-国产三级电影久久久-国产三级电影免费-国产三级电影免费观看

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【dominatrix: gender, eroticism, and control in the dungeon summary】ACLU warns that 'no replies' on Twitter could violate the constitution

Source:Feature Flash Editor:hotspot Time:2025-07-02 07:25:38

Trump was basically Obama's reply guy throughout the 2010s,dominatrix: gender, eroticism, and control in the dungeon summary so it's only fitting that he won't be able to take advantage of a new Twitter feature intended to curb his own comment trolls...legally, at least.

Twitter is testing an ability that lets users limit who can reply to their tweets. If you're part of the test, you'll be able to determine whether everyone can reply (the norm and current default), if only people that you follow can reply, or if only people you tag in a tweet can reply. If you don't tag anyone and go with that last option, you're basically turning off all replies, period.

Reactions to the new feature have been mixed. Some people are praising it as a way to stop potential harassers from replying. Others are joking about the feature's elitism. And of course, still more have turned the "no replies" tweet into a meme already.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

One important take points out the constitutional and legal ramifications of the feature for public officials. The ACLU has issued a statement that public officials need to be careful about how they use the reply-limiting features, lest they violate the First Amendment.

As a general matter, Twitter’s investment in user controls is a good thing. But public officials would be violating the First Amendment if they were to use this tool to block speakers on any accounts they’ve opened up for public conversation in their roles as government actors. Nor should public officials use this tool to decide who can, or can't, reply to accounts they have opened up for requests for government assistance, which may be on the rise due to COVID-19.

For the past several years, courts have been grappling with whether a public figure blocking someone on Twitter constitutes a violation of their first amendment rights. Most notably, the Court of Appeals upheld a ruling in a lawsuit brought against President Trump, saying that he was not allowed to block people after they had offended or disagreed with him, because it impinged on their freedom to engage in political speech.

The ACLU apparently sees the "no replies" feature as an extension of the idea of blocking because it limits speech in what has effectively become a digital public square. So, the new test features might be valuable, but people in the public eye are going to have to be careful about how they use them.

Topics Social Media X/Twitter Politics

0.3304s , 9920.1875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【dominatrix: gender, eroticism, and control in the dungeon summary】ACLU warns that 'no replies' on Twitter could violate the constitution,Feature Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美日韩精品无码免费看A片 | 日韩精品无码一区 | 2024av伦理片 | 亚洲精品无码mv在线 | 精品视频一区二区三区在线播放 | 在线播放免费人成毛片软件 | 狠狠操网址 | 久伊人网| 成人免费黄网站 | 永久免费观看影视剧的电视软件 | 99久久久国产 | 乱子轮视频在线看 | 在线观看特色大片免费网站 | 久久久久人妻精品区一三寸 | 中文字幕人妻少妇引诱隔壁 | 免费看成人羞羞视频网站在线看 | 日韩一区二区在线观看视频 | 99久久国产精品视频 | 2024高清国产一区二区三 | 亚洲欧美日韩网站 | 国产精品中文久久久久久 | 免费看一级a片在线观看 | 亚洲综合另类小说色区 | 在线播放精品一区二区啪视频 | 亚洲 校园 春色 另类 图片 | 51精品红桃视频 | 国产亚洲精品久久无码小说 | 激情射精爆插热吻无码视频 | 日本无码特黄午夜视频在线观看 | 国产经典自拍视频在线观看 | 年轻丰满的继牳5伦A片 | 少妇人妻偷人精品无码av | 亚洲综合av免费在线观看 | 亚洲av无码片一区二区三区 | 亚洲一区日韩二区欧美三区 | 在线观看有码制服中文 | 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠888米奇 | 精品少妇ay一区二区三区 | 一本大道波多野吉衣 | 看全黄大色黄大片老人做 | 五月色播先锋在线丁香 |