国产三级大片在线观看-国产三级电影-国产三级电影经典在线看-国产三级电影久久久-国产三级电影免费-国产三级电影免费观看

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【porno izlemek neden yasak】Wikipedia demotes Breitbart to fake news

Source:Feature Flash Editor:knowledge Time:2025-07-02 10:13:50

Wikipedia,porno izlemek neden yasak the internet's crowd-sourced encyclopedia, has declared "fake news" on far-right site Breitbart, deeming the outlet an unreliable source for facts.

SEE ALSO: Milo Yiannopoulos' Facebook rant shows that de-platforming actually works

The decision, flagged by Motherboard, was declared on September 25, 2018 after an ongoing discussion amongst site administrators that concluded, "[Breitbart] should not be used, ever, as a reference for facts, due to its unreliability.

Scrolling through the debate is enlightening, seeing the various reaction from site admins to the nature of Breitbart, with some comparing it to the Daily Mail, the UK paper that was similarly demoted as an unreliable source in 2017.


You May Also Like

Support. If anything, it's even more unreliable than the Daily Mail, as they at least use trained journalists, whereas Breitbart is a fringe propaganda organization which lets its extreme partisan bias get in the way of howit reports things, and whetherit does so, just as Fox News does. It too should be deprecated, but let's start with Breitbart (and InfoWars). -- BullRangifer(talk) PingMe17:51, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

And:

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Support. I don't like the use of blanket bans, but Breitbart seems to satisfy the conditions that required the Daily Mail one - an obviously unreliable source, with a reputation for inaccurate stories, which a few users nonetheless insist on trying to use as if it were a reliable news source.

Some opposed the comparison, too, claiming the issue with the Daily Mail was about fabricated stories rather than unreliability and partisanship:

"I will support a ban for any news outlet if it is proven it is currently fabricating stories on a regular basis, but no evidence of fabrication has been presented in the proposal. The precedent established by The Daily Mailban simply does not apply in this case."

Breitbart isn't completely banned, though, as citations for the site will still be allowed in regards to opinion and commentary.

Motherboard also notes a similar August discussion surrounding Info Wars that was eventually closed citing the "Snowball clause," which states: "If an issue does not have a snowball's chance in hell of being accepted by a certain process, there's no need to run it through the entire process."

TL;DR, no one in their right mind would believe an Info Wars citation anyway so there's no need to ban it.

That President Trump has legitimized both sites did little to sway the Wikipedia decisions so it remains to be seen what this does for his own rallying cry of "fake news."

0.1416s , 8108.6328125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【porno izlemek neden yasak】Wikipedia demotes Breitbart to fake news,Feature Flash  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 青青河边草免费观 | 日本仓库集体肉交视频 | 无码人妻欧美丰满熟妇区毛片 | 国产欧美视频在线 | 国产亚洲小视频线播放 | 精品国产A∨无码一区二区三区 | 精品日本一区二区三区在线观看 | 老妇毛片久久久久久久久 | 日本手机在线视频 | 日本护士视频 | 久久草情侣vs国产 | 美女露出尿口让男人揉动态图网站 | 国产精品A成V人在线播放 | 日韩色情一区二区无码AV | 视频一本大道香蕉久在线播放 | 亚洲成AV人片一区二区三区 | 日韩国产 | 99久久精品免费网站 | 毛片高清一区二区三区 | 综合国产免费拔擦拔擦8x高清在线人 | 国产麻豆成人传媒免费观看 | 亚洲欧美色鬼久久综合 | 青青草视频成年视频在緌观看详情介绍 | 九九这里只精品视在线99 | 成人欧美一区二区区在线 | 777精品出轨人妻国产 | 天堂资源中文最新版在线 | 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕二区 | 色综合久久精品亚洲国产 | 色综合久久精品亚洲国产消防 | 色五月激情中文字幕 | 精品一卡2卡三卡4卡三卡免费 | 日本免费在线看 | 蜜芽成人A片免费视频 | 日本一本专区一区二区三区 | 日本老熟五十路息孑安野由美 | 亚洲日韩欧美视频一区 | 日韩v片 | 性奴抽插乳中出精没射视频搜索 | 精品AV亚洲乱码一区二区 | 自慰网大全在线观看 |