Adobe is casual sex videos outdoorsupdating its Terms of Use after ambiguous language sparked backlash from users about the privacy and ownership of their work.
In a blog post on Monday, the company that makes the creative software tools Photoshop, Premier, and InDesign said it would be rolling out updated language in its user terms by June 18, 2024. "At Adobe, there is no ambiguity in our stance, our commitment to our customers, and innovating responsibly in this space," wrote EVPs Scott Belsky, who oversees product, and Dana Rao, who oversees legal and policy.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Belsky and Rao wrote that their company has "never trained generative AI on customer content," nor taken ownership of people's unpublished work, and that Adobe wasn't announcing an intention to do these things with the recent ToS update. It's worth noting that Adobe’s Firefly generative AI models are trained on contributions to Adobe’s stock library along with public domain data, but this is being treated as distinct from content created by users for their own personal and professional purposes.
"That said, we agree that evolving our Terms of Use to reflect our commitments to our community is the right thing to do," wrote Belsky and Rao.
Last week, a PR fiasco erupted when users were notified of Adobe's updated Terms of Use. Without clear explanation of what the changes meant, or what was changed, Adobe users assumed the worst and believed the updated terms meant drastic changes to the autonomy of their content. Specifically, users thought Adobe could now access unpublished work for training its Firefly AI models and could even assume ownership of works in progress. The updates lacked clarity and transparency during a time when generative AI tools are perceived as threatening the work and livelihoods of creatives. Swift backlash followed, including promises to abandon the platform.
But as it turns out, Adobe's updated policy that grants the company access to user content was about screening for activity that breaks the law or violates its terms. Adobe said it never intended on training its models on user content or usurping any control. Belsky and Rao also asserted that users have the choice to "not participate in its product improvement program" (sharing content for model training), that its licenses are "narrowly tailored to the activities needed" such as scanning for inappropriate or illegal behavior, and that Adobe does not scan user content stored locally on their computers.
So, all of this could have been avoided with clearer communication, but some reputational damage has likely been done.
"We recognize that trust must be earned," said Belsky and Rao, closing the post.
Topics Artificial Intelligence Privacy
'Time' magazine's latest cover is a bold shot at Donald Trump and RussiaHere's what it would take for Trump to actually get impeachedApple's new ad takes us to a New Orleans barber shop — with one familiar guestTwo siblings somehow drew their mom the exact same Mother's Day cardTeen wins the right to perform in drag at high school after classmates sign petitionHarry Styles is the king of answering questions in the vaguest terms possibleTwitter goes nuts over Trump's 'nut job' commentMan gets revenge on rude people in coffee shop with a hilarious power moveWhat's Mike Pence thinking about in this photo?Amber Rose calls out Tyga and Beyoncé in a possible hack, or just weird joke Cut the Music The Apple iPod: Pocket Music Before That Phone Dreams Deferred The Thou of Zadie Smith Amazon Big Spring Sale: Loftie smart alarm clock deal Wordle today: The answer and hints for March 29, 2025 Amazon Spring Sale 2025: Best Bang & Olufsen H95 headphones deal X sold —?to Elon Musk's AI company Amazon Big Spring Sale highlights: 45 items that are 50% off or more OpenAI responds to criticism of ChatGPT's Studio Ghibli
0.2072s , 10324.2421875 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【casual sex videos outdoors】Adobe to update terms of service amid backlash,Feature Flash